How does the song go?
h/t to Breitbart TV.
How does the song go?
h/t to Breitbart TV.
The cost? $1.1 million not including Obama administration officials. Good thing they went before passing a carbon tax, eh?
Are our representatives aware of the money they’re spending?
For 15 Democratic and 6 Republican Congressmen, food and rooms for two nights cost $4,406 tax dollars each. That’s $2,200 a day – more than most Americans spend on their monthly mortgage payment.
CBS News asked members of Congress and staff about whether they’re mindful that it’s public tax dollars they’re spending. Many said they had never even seen the bills or the expense reports.
Now this is a problem. Don’t these idiots even have to sign their own expense reports? Culture of corruption anyone?
Seven times since Scott Brown won? Whiners…
When the going gets tough, the …. oh, never mind.
Must be to politicians, at least of the Democratic variety or they wouldn’t have come so close to passing Obamacare. Of course, they haven’t given up yet either.
Hey, the Church of Global warming is pretty damn far down the list of the public’s priorities. Guess they better get Rev Algore out speaking.
Let’s not forget Boulder’s very own global warming preacher with access to the Daily Camera’s editorial page, Clay Evans who said in a pre-climategate/glaciergate editorial…
Certainty is indeed hard to come by. But anyone who chooses to “believe” that global warming is, as one U.S. Senator has put it, a “hoax,” or at least that its dangers have been overblown, must also accept that they stand against science.
They must also accept that the consequences of their beliefs, if they hold sway, are nothing less than one selfish generation bequeathing a brutal future and disaster-ridden planet upon its children and (if there are any) grandchildren.
Seems like Clay sets his own table here with a false choice. You’re either with him or against him. If you force me to choose, I’m absolutely against him.
Oh, and about those scientists…. well that’s a story for another day.
Jammie Wearing fool chimes in with this post, Pew Research: Nobody Really Gives a Rat’s Ass About Global Warming.
Apparetly the “blame Bush” strategy is out of gas. Can the Democrats change their stripes? Color me doubtful. Does Obama think he’s the only President that came into office with a multitude of problems? Well…. perhaps he does.
Hey, I’m not blind, he is facin
This editorial says more about the author and the editorial staff of newspapers that run it then it does about conservatives.
Of course full speed ahead with Cap n Trade. Science, such as it was in this case, is morphing into some type of religion right before our very eyes.
What has now come to light, however, is that the scientist from whom this claim originated, Dr Syed Hasnain, has for the past two years been working as a senior employee of The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), the Delhi-based company of which Dr Pachauri is director-general. Furthermore, the claim – now disowned by Dr Pachauri as chairman of the IPCC – has helped TERI to win a substantial share of a $500,000 grant from one of America’s leading charities, along with a share in a three million euro research study funded by the EU.
One can only hope that the Daily Camera brings this to the attention of their readers. Use their Yahoo search bar to see the “excellent” coverage they have provided for the ongoing Climategate scandal.
Oh, more here….
The scientist behind the bogus claim in a Nobel Prize-winning UN report that Himalayan glaciers will have melted by 2035 last night admitted it was included purely to put political pressure on world leaders. (emphasis added – ed)
Do the ends justify the means? Especially if the “ends” are truly in question? Of course if it’s a religion then it’s different isn’t it? All you have to do is “believe”.
Turns out education mismatch is leading to women who can’t find a mate. Dr. Helen examines an article by Richard Whitmore, author of Why Boys Fail. Most interesting is her conclusion…
So our society has created a mess where men are vilified in the classroom, fed PC rhetoric, told their life’s goal is to make women happy and do anything that assists her with her goals, while simultaneously told that he is a dope, idiot and unable to care properly for children, and now people are questioning where Mr. Right went?
He just became the stereotype that society has portrayed him as for the last 20 years. It is certainly no mystery that women can no longer find “Mr. Right.”
Apparently not a problem that Arlen Specter suffers from.
Almost as interesting as Dr. Helen’s post are the comments. I especially enjoy the thread that turned into a comment on our young high school students and the lack either motivation or challenges…
Helen, I can’t find fault with your theory, except to say this: As someone who teaches mostly at the high school senior level, I am convinced our school systems and society have created a generation left unchallenged. By this, I mean they have been told for years that success is nothing to get excited about, and they will be just fine coasting along, with everything being done FOR them. Male or female… a generation trained to entitlements. I can’t help but be certain this translates into their personal relationships as well.
Now I suspect the teacher is somewhat jaded as I have been impressed by some of the high school students that I have met. I do agree that sending the message that success doesn’t matter is a problem.
LOL, you really can’t make this stuff up. Why are liberals and progressive so willing to follow these guys over a cliff? How come this isn’t picked up by the legacy media in the United States?
Rep. Anthony Weiner (D) – NY
My how times have changed.
Scott Brown wins. No links as I’m sure anyone who cares already knows. Congratulations, great opportunity to start over on health care reform. Congratulations Mr. Brown.
if it’s a “just cause” and the candidate is a Democrat and Obamacare hangs in the balance…
World misled over Himalayan glacier meltdown
A WARNING that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 is likely to be retracted after a series of scientific blunders by the United Nations body that issued it.
Two years ago the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a benchmark report that was claimed to incorporate the latest and most detailed research into the impact of global warming. A central claim was the world’s glaciers were melting so fast that those in the Himalayas could vanish by 2035.
In the past few days the scientists behind the warning have admitted that it was based on a news story in the New Scientist, a popular science journal, published eight years before the IPCC’s 2007 report.
You really can’t make this stuff up. Global warming true believers, what would IPCC have to do to plant just a tiny seed of doubt in your mind?
More here.
The answer to the above question is found in the comments in the 2nd link…
I praise all the constant exposure of these governmental, UN, and university “intellectual” criminals and fraudsters, but I’m afraid the reality “deniers” will never allow their indoctrinated minds to be brought back from the dark side. Half the population of the earth could freeze to death and they would still be babbling on about how the earth’s temperature is getting hotter and how we humans are to blame 100%…
Fuzzlenutter on January 17, 2010 at 1:49 PM
Bring Obamacare to a screeching halt. Volunteer here.
added @ 10:28a
Massachusetts shocker: Brown Up 15% in Pajamas Media/CrossTarget Poll
… and comments from two religious zealots. Danny Glover meet Pat Robertson.
Idiots both.