Insulting the electorate….

Is it a wise campaign strategy?  John Hinderaker comments….

He concludes…

In 2008, millions of voters gambled on the hope that the Democrats might have something to offer other than their historic recipe of higher taxes and spending and more government power. Over the last two years, those voters have found out they were wrong. The Democrats have no new ideas; unlike Joe Biden’s description of the Republicans, this is your father’s Democratic Party (if your father is of the generation of Jimmy Carter and Ted Kennedy). Thus is is entirely logical, and not the result of some irrational spasm, that independent voters should turn away from the Democrats, and that Republicans should be energized and Democrats–those who had hoped for more, at least–dispirited. It is true that some Americans are fearful; after seeing the Democrats’ performance over the last two years, they should be. (emphasis added – Ed)

To elite’s I think that dissing the electorate that disagrees with them comes naturally.  I know in Boulder, dissing Republican’s does.

Posted in Boulder is stoopid, politics | Leave a comment

Associated Press Poll

Obama Supporters Defecting to GOP, Poll Shows

It’s a wide enthusiasm gap that’s buoying Republicans, who are poised for big electoral gains, and worrying Democrats, who are seeking to hang onto majorities in Congress as well among governors. Obama’s party hopes its superior get-out-the-vote operation, updated from his groundbreaking campaign, can overcome Republicans’ energized supporters to mitigate expected losses across the board

Didn’t I say something like “I can’t wait to vote!”?

Sweet.

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

Payback

Bill Clinton back out campaigning ‘for everybody that helped Hillary run for president’ against Obama

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

Foriegn Money: Say it ain’t so

House and Senate Democrats have received approximately $1.02 million this cycle from such PACs, according to an analysis compiled for The Hill by the Center for Responsive Politics. House and Senate GOP leaders have taken almost $510,000 from PACs on the same list.


hmmmm

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

Sebastian Pinera: Trapped Miners vs. Barak Obama: BP Oil spill

The leadership of Chile President Sebastian Pinera, believing fiercely in globalization and free markets, and not believing in limits, seemed to make a critical difference.

Pinera refused to shut out foreign expertise. As the world focused on Chile’s miners underground, the rescue operation above was characterized by an Apollo 13-like sense of mission. Failure was not an option.

That gave the mission an international flavor a la “Star Trek.” Unlike President Obama, who invoked the Jones Act to spurn foreign offers of help in April’s Gulf oil spill, or Russia’s Vladimir Putin, who said “nyet” to American naval rescue ships after the Kursk nuclear sub sank in Arctic waters in 2000, leaving 29 to die at a depth of 650 feet, Pinera brought in the best brains outside his country to improve the odds of success

Read the whole IBD editorial.

Daniel Henninger at the Wall Street Journal comments on the life saving drill bit technology courtesy of capitalism.

If those miners had been trapped a half-mile down like this 25 years ago anywhere on earth, they would be dead. What happened over the past 25 years that meant the difference between life and death for those men?

Short answer: the Center Rock drill bit.

This is the miracle bit that drilled down to the trapped miners. Center Rock Inc. is a private company in Berlin, Pa. It has 74 employees. The drill’s rig came from Schramm Inc. in West Chester, Pa. Seeing the disaster, Center Rock’s president, Brandon Fisher, called the Chileans to offer his drill. Chile accepted. The miners are alive.

h/t to Betsy’s Page.

Posted in Boulder is stoopid, capitalism, the weekend | Leave a comment

Boulder County Open Space Tax 1B

There is a letter to the editor in Sunday’s Daily camera from Hunter Lovins and Paul Sheldon Hygiene encouraging the passage of the County Open Space tax, ballot issue 1B.

I tried to respond on the papers comments section but it was too long.  Tried to split it and that didn’t work.  Trimmed it down and that didn’t work.  So here’s my original response.

HUNTER LOVINS and PAUL SHELDON HYGIENE

So is this the perfect storm to vote for MORE open space tax or is there simply not an open space tax you wouldn’t support? For every open space tax the county asks for I’m sure they can paint an alluring picture of need. The world will not stop spinning on its axis and Boulder will not cease to be the 24 square miles surrounded by reality if this issue doens’t pass. Camelot will not cease to exist.

Is any amount too much? Is there ever any trade off between Open Space taxes and quality of life improvement it provides? How much property taken off our tax rolls is too much? When does the Open Space department stop growing and start taking care of what it has? When will their access to the general fund be cutoff? Ever heard of the Great Recession?

Think about this, every open space purchase is a future liability to take care of and preserve. Just like the County can’t pave subdivision roads, 20 years from now they will be asking for money to maintain of all their purchases. The thirst for tax money from the Open Space department is unquenchable and it’s time to start reigning in this powerful arm of Boulder County government.

Also, why did the Boulder County Commissioners decide to use misleading ballot language. See Bob Greenlee’s August 29th column.

So our leaders can’t add the text to the ballot measure stating something to the effect “…for a total tax of 117 million over 20 years?”. I know these guys have the thick skin to “take the heat” but they didn’t do it. To re-emphasize a point already made above here is an excerpt from the ballot language…

“…AND, TO THE EXTENT MONEYS FROM SUCH TAX ARE NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE REPAYMENT OF SUCH BONDS, FROM OTHER COUNTY OPEN SPACE SALES AND USE TAX REVENUES, THE CONSERVATION TRUST FUND, THE COUNTY’S GENERAL FUND AND OTHER LEGALLY AVAILABLE FUNDS,”

You can read the ballot language on the County website. You will see if there’s money anywhere in the County system the Open Space Department can seize it to pay the bonds. That’s quite an incentive to be fiscally responsible isn’t it?

This tax can wait until another year (well probably 2 years!) and in the meantime Boulder County can collect the taxes from the landowners. Just say NO to Open Space Ballot issue 1B

Posted in Boulder is stoopid, open space | Leave a comment

Elitism

Bill Whittle explains elitism. 

Of course there are no elites in Boulder.

Posted in Boulder is stoopid | Leave a comment

Note to Boulder Progressives…

I CAN’T WAIT TO VOTE
Boulder Progressives, if this doesn’t scare you, you haven’t been outside the 24 square miles lately.
Will I make a difference in Boulder?  Who knows, but with 5 tax bills odds are that “I” and people like me  will.  Start working on your rationalizations now.
Added 10/16 @ 10:41a

See you in November.

Added 10/16 @ 11:33p 

I sorta have to retract the 5 tax bills since I can only vote on the County issues.

Posted in Boulder is stoopid, politics | Leave a comment

I Want Your Money

Certainly not a foreign concept to the Boulder Daily Camera, the Boulder Weekly or the typical Boudler Progressive.

Posted in Boulder is stoopid, politics | Leave a comment

2010 Tax endorsments from local papers

When it comes to taxes, the Boulder Weekly and the Boulder Daily Camera move in lockstep.

County Human Services:              1A    YES

County Open Space:                   1B    YES

City of Boulder
   Public Accommodations Tax:      2A   YES

City of Boulder
    Utility Occupation Tax:           2B   YES

BV School District  3A:              3A    YES

One thing Boulder progressives are good at is group think and the editors of both the Boulder Daily Camera and the Boulder Weekly should plead guilty.  Needless to say, in their vision of the perfect world these taxes are necessary.

Let’s get this straight, the American Public is in the middle of the Great Recession and the media progressives can’t find a tax they don’t like.  This is beyond pathetic, it should be nothing short of ABSOLUTELY EMBARRASSING. 

At least the Boulder Weekly admits to their bias

As for our endorsements, we were disappointed to find that we endorsed a slate made up entirely of Democrats. We try to evaluate individuals on their merits, not their politics. We tried our best to find some Republicans and independents to endorse. But with everyone on the right wearing their anger on their sleeves and trying to Tea Party harder than the competition, we had no choice but to go with Democrats.

No choice.  I suggest you get outside the 24 square miles and venture into reality.

You can view the Boulder Weekly endorsements here.

For some reason, the Boulder Daily Camera doesn’t have a web page that summarizes their 2010 endorsements.  If they have one, I wish they would tell me how in the hell to search for it so I could locate it.

I can’t vote for City taxes but the the only tax I will consider voting YES for is County Human Services Tax, 1A.  It will be interesting to see how the election turns out.  As I’ve said before, “I can’t wait to vote”.  Our ballots haven’t arrived yet.

Posted in Boulder is stoopid | Leave a comment

Don’t even think about it…

Pension reform in France is not going well.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

On November 2nd they will ignore us no more

h/t to Powerline. They reference this comment from Michael Barone…

Michael Barone comments: “I think this ad, from Colorado Republican Senate candidate Ken Buck and spotted by National Review’s Jim Geraghty, sums up one reason for the energy and enthusiasm of the tea party and other aroused opponents of the Obama Democrats this year.” Barone adds: “Liberals who are puzzled by what’s happening should take 30 seconds and watch this ad.”

I can’t wait to vote. Of course, no changes in the 24 square miles surrounded by reality expected. On the other hand, it will be interesting to see what the pundits say when 90% of the new taxes are defeated. It’s mind boggling how all the Boulder publications have absolutely no shame in recommending every tax increase on the ballot.

Posted in politics, Tea Party | Leave a comment

Lawsuit Overturning Healthcare Reform can Proceed

Good news, the State’s lawsuit against Obamacare and the Federal government can proceed. The individual mandate is one of the 2 remaining claims in the lawsuit.

Not surprisingly, the Fed’s state…

Hmmm, like this hasn’t happened before when the tables were turned?

From a separate Politico article, the judge states…

Ya don’t say.

One final note, every state has a risk pool, every state. That means health isurance is available to everyone. The problem is it’s expensive but that’s because health insurance IS expensive. There are many people who can get health insurance but don’t elect to purchase it. A vast subset of these folks can afford it but elect not to pay what the believe are outrageous prices. Part of that problem is they have no reference to what healthcare costs or what the group plan they were on previous costs. In their temper tantrum against the “evil insurance companies” they shoot themselves in the foot. This subset of the uninsured I have little sympathy for.

On the issue of the so-called “individual mandate,” the law’s provision that all Americans obtain healthcare insurance, Vinson said the plaintiffs had “most definitely stated a plausible claim” for their objections.

“The power that the individual mandate seeks to harness is simply without prior precedent,” he said.

“Having failed in the legislative arena, opponents of reform are now turning to the courts in an attempt to overturn the work of the democratically elected branches of government,” Stephanie Cutter, an assistant to the president for special projects, wrote on the White House blog. “This is nothing new. We saw this with the Social Security Act, the Civil Rights Act, and the Voting Rights Act – constitutional challenges were brought to all three of these monumental pieces of legislation, and all of those challenges failed. So too will the challenge to health reform.”

On the issue of the so-called “individual mandate,” the law’s provision that all Americans obtain healthcare insurance, Vinson said the plaintiffs had “most definitely stated a plausible claim” for their objections.

“The power that the individual mandate seeks to harness is simply without prior precedent,” he said.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

21.4% Increase in spending in two years

The Wall Street Journal opines on the recent increase in spending by Congress.



This paragraph is particularly interesting…

Once again domestic accounts far and away led the increases. Medicaid rose by 8.7%, and unemployment benefits by an astonishing 34.3%—to $160 billion. The costs of jobless insurance have tripled in two years. CBO adds that if you take out the savings for deposit insurance, funding for all “other activities” of government—education, transportation, foreign aid, housing, and so on—rose by 13% in 2010.

Daily Camera editorial columnist Clay Evans will no doubt be particularly proud of the 34.3% increase in unemployment benefits.

The opinion piece concludes…

The 21.4% federal spending increase in two years ought to put to rest any debate about the nature of America’s fiscal problem. The Pelosi Congress has used the recession as an excuse to send spending to record heights, and its economic policies have contributed to a lousy recovery. The solution is to stop the spending and change the policies. Polls open on November 2. (emphasis added – ed)

I can’t wait to vote.  Our mail in ballots haven’t shown up yet, but they will be returned before the Daily Camera can tell us how to vote on ALL the issues.

Imagine, all of this spending and no shovel ready projects!?

Posted in Boulder is stoopid, free money, stoopid Democrats, you can't make this stuff up | Leave a comment

The Silver Fever continues…

Silver charts

Gold charts

Posted in gold | Leave a comment

Democrats “On the fringe”

In Boulder I’m sure that’s just where they want to be.  Not so much the rest of the nation, especially “flyover country”.

Here are some highlights from The Hill 2010 Midterm Election Poll done by the polling firm Penn, Schoen and Berland :

  • Results for independent voters reflected the larger sample. Forty-three percent of likely independent voters said the Democratic party is more dominated by its extreme elements compared to 37 percent who though the GOP had fallen under the sway of extreme views.
  • The data surprised Democratic strategists and political experts in a campaign season when much media attention has focused on the battle between the GOP establishment and Tea Party-backed candidates such as Sharron Angle in Nevada and Christine O’Donnell in Delaware.

Doing her part recently, Daily Camera editorial page editor Erika Stutzmen couldn’t resist taking a swipe at Christine O’Donnell in an editorial that on the surface was about Republicans not showing up for a local debate.

Moving on…

  • “All the press coverage has been about how these Tea Party candidates are fringe ideologues, and there have been high-profile examples of them proving the point,” he added. “Yet, still at this moment, you have independents saying, ‘I think the Democrats are little more extreme than the Republicans.’” Once again the DC was glad to carry the Democrats water.
  • The survey also showed that a majority of Democratic voters want their representatives in Congress to work harder to achieve compromise with Republicans. Fifty-eight percent of Democrats said they would urge the lawmaker they supported to “look for compromises across the aisle”; only 35 percent would rather urge their representatives to “stay firm on their principles.”

    Kessler, of Third Way, said this is a sign that many Democrats think their party has shifted too far to the left in recent years.Now that sounds inflammatory.  Negotiate with the “party of no”!??

Jammy wearing fool also comments on the poll results…
 

In other words, clear-thinking people have tuned out the lamestream media and their mantra about how crazy tea partiers are. The think they can constantly harp on Angle and O’Donnell yet they overlook the surge nationwide from independents toward the GOP. The media won’t change, they’ll just lose more viewers and readers.

Well the Daily Camera lost our readership many years ago.  I can’t imagine why a Republican/Conservative would subscribe to the paper except to “know what the enemy” is up to.

And here’s the real gem…

Meanwhile, the delusional extremist who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue says the GOP will have to accommodate him more when they take over. I’ll have some of what he’s smoking.

The arrogance never stops.  I haven’t missed an election in many years, including primaries, but most of the time my vote meant nothing.  I can’t wait to vote this year.  I think the results will be very interesting.

Updated on 10/14 at 10:45pm

Darren over at Right On the Left Coast chimes in with his “He Just Doesn’t Get It” post. 

Uh, Barack? You are going to have to learn how to get along with Republicans, too.

Gawd, this man’s arrogance and self-importance know no bounds.

Posted in politics | Leave a comment

Green Bandits

Show them our money.

The video.

Posted in enviro wackos | 3 Comments

Word cloud on the Fed’s

What American’s think of the federal government.  From the Gallup organization.

Wonder what a word cloud from Boulder would look like?  I can guarantee you the word “TOO BIG” would NOT be SO BIG.

Posted in big government, stoopid Democrats | Leave a comment

From Hope and Change to angry diatribes

The Democrats scramble to find enemies to demonize

They’re just hoping that making the accusation will gin up their base. Recklessly swinging these accusations around won’t get them votes from the independents that they need to turn out for them. All they have left is playing to the fever swamps of their base.

… and that would include Boulder.

Posted in politics, stoopid Democrats | Leave a comment

No Boulder Democrat

That’s for sure.

Posted in politics | Leave a comment