“Basic problem is that all models are wrong,” writes Phil Jones, bluntly, “not got enough middle and low level clouds.”

ALL MODELS ARE WRONG.

From the release of the ClimateGate 2.0 e-mails…

“I can’t overstate the HUGE amount of political interest in the project as a message that the Government can give on climate change to help them tell their story,” a civil servant wrote to Phil Jones in 2009. “They want the story to be a very strong one and don’t want to be made to look foolish.”

Having elevated global warming to the most dramatic, urgent and over-riding issue of the day, bureaucrats, NGOs, politicians and funding agencies demanded that the scientists must keep the whole bandwagon rolling. It had become too big to stop.

“The science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run,” laments one scientist, Peter Thorne. While Professor Jagadish Shukla, a lead IPCC author, IGES founder, and one of the most senior climate experts writes that, “It is inconceivable that policymakers will be willing to make billion-and trillion-dollar decisions for adaptation to the projected regional climate change based on models that do not even describe and simulate the processes that are the building blocks of climate variability.”

MORE from a supporter of the global warming hypothesis…

This was why the first Climategate caused such repercussions. The revelations came as little surprise to those few who follow state of temperature reconstructions, but they rocked supporters who had put their trust in climate scientists. Clive Crook, a believer in the manmade global warming hypothesis and supporter of carbon reduction measures, expressed it like this:

“The closed-mindedness of these supposed men of science, their willingness to go to any lengths to defend a preconceived message, is surprising even to me. The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering.”


IT’S RELIGION NOT SCIENCE.

Boulderites, this might be a good time to re-read Clay Evans climate change editorial Evans: Global warming? We better believe it. One of Clay’s conclusions is:

Certainty is indeed hard to come by. But anyone who chooses to “believe” that global warming is, as one U.S. Senator has put it, a “hoax,” or at least that its dangers have been overblown, must also accept that they stand against science.


Trust the experts Clay, trust the experts. They have no agenda, no political pressure, no million dollar grants to bring in, no conferences in exotic places. No, only evil corporations have conflicts like this and the government is the protector and savior of the common folk.

At this point in time, let me repeat that GLOABAL WARMING IS A RELIGION NOT SCIENCE.

This entry was posted in arrogance, climate change, Climategate, global warming, stoopid scientists. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.