Here is how selected energy service stocks are trading this morning:
Quotes courtesy of Yahoo finance. (Click to enlarge)
Here is how selected energy service stocks are trading this morning:
Quotes courtesy of Yahoo finance. (Click to enlarge)
No doubt, oil service stocks have had a big run, up 78% on average since the January 2007 low, as evidenced by the chart below…
What makes this most interesting is that Petrobras, the state owned Brazilian oil company has contracted 80% of deep water oil service deep water drilling capacity. The Bloomberg article reports…
“The oil majors have their backs against the wall as Petrobras has aggressively locked up significant rig capacity,” said Omar Nokta, head of maritime research at Dahlman Rose & Co. in New York.
Petrobras is negotiating for as many as 17 more vessels to probe the Tupi discovery and neighboring fields, said Bill Herbert, an analyst at Simmons & Co. International in Houston. The company already controls almost seven times as much capacity as the next biggest user of rigs that can drill in 7,500 feet of water, according to research by Dahlman Rose.
Seems like Brazil, unlike the United States, understands the importance of oil for many years to come. It also seems like oil drillers, especially deep water oil drillers are going to be very busy and charging lost of money for it.
I’m sure the vast majority of Boulderites find the speaker in the suit more annoying. Readers of the blog know I’m on the other side.
Hat-tip to Newmark’s Door.
From todays Investors Business Daily an editorial on polar bears…
Regulation: The Interior Department ruled Wednesday that the polar bear will be protected as a threatened species. Why special treatment for an animal whose population has more than doubled over the last 50 years?
and the answer is…
The polar bear is more than just a cuddly looking beast that roams the Arctic region. It’s a wishbone in the fight between misanthropic activists determined to send the developed world back a few centuries and those who wish to see human development go forward.
Sad polar bear stranded on ice floe courtesy of AP. Get the picture?
These beautiful creatures have become pawns in the environmentalists’ campaign to block oil and gas exploration and drilling in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and beyond.
Hat tip to Instapundit.
Credit where it’s due from The Australian.
The need to paint Americans as a greedy, selfish, war-mongering superpower cannot be disturbed by facts. It matters not that, in the year before the tsunami, the US provided $2.4 billion in humanitarian relief: 40per cent of all the relief aid given to the world in 2003. Never mind that development and emergency relief rose from $10 billion during the last year of Bill Clinton’s administration to $24 billion under George W. Bush in 2003. Or that, according to a German study, Americans contribute to charities nearly seven times as much a head as Germans do. Or that, adjusted for population, American philanthropy is more than two-thirds more than British giving.
There is a teenaged immaturity about the rest of the world’s relationship with the US. Whenever a serious crisis erupts somewhere, our dependence on the US becomes obvious, and many hate the US because of it. That the hatred is irrational is beside the point.
Read it all, NOW.
Possible budget crunch coming up due to a decline in sales tax revenue. What is the first suggestion out of council members mouths? You guessed it…
One of the possible solutions to a downturn in city revenue, some council members suggested, would be to ask voters to approve tax increases or other offsetting measures in November.
LOL, this is the typical mindset of the leadership of both the City and the County. And why not, they get almost every tax increase they ask for. It’s for the Children, it’s for the illegal workers, it’s for the prairie dogs and of course the Cadillac of reasons, it’s for open space.
Read the article and by all means peruse the comments. Judging from the commenter’s, a tax increase wouldn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell. That said, who elected these yahoo’s? They just might still be willing to vote another tax increase on themselves!
Dr. Helen takes on Google contest “Doodle for Google” and teachers and asks the question…
“What if …schools stopped brainwashing kids in PC rhetoric and actually taught them to read and write?”
and answer it…
We might have fewer kids who ended up like the ones in Dallas–75 percent of the seniors headed to Dallas community colleges can’t read above an 8th grade level and others can’t add or subtract– and more who actually knew something.
Where recylcing happens. I visit ecocyle almost every Sunday morning.
The entrance…
The view from the sign to the facility
The various recycling categories…
…and here we have the political stickers. If you live in Boulder and aren’t for Obama, you’re for this guy. Also, I find it quite irritating when supposed non-profits either display political banners themselves, or allow political banners/stickers to be displayed on their property.
Not even for 1 minute! Guess they’re serious.
Taken in Longmont when I was ordering flowers for Mother’s Day. This is in the alley behind the flower shop.
Below are Berkshire holdings from the 2007 annual report. You can see the holdings reported in the 2006 annual report here.
Not to well, with a 4% loss in the last two days alone (5/9 and 5/12) and an 8% loss since May 2nd. I’m sure Warren’s not bothered in the least, and I had no clue until I captured the chart for this blog post. No news on Yahoo to explain the drop.
Chart from TC2000.
A 1974 Forbes article profiling Warren Buffett, reprinted prior to this years shareholder meeting.
His view of the market in 1974…
How do you contemplate the current stock market, we asked Warren Buffett, the sage of Omaha, Neb.
“Like an oversexed guy in a harem,” he shot back. “This is the time to start investing.”
patience in investing…
Stay dispassionate and be patient is Buffett’s message. “You’re dealing with a lot of silly people in the marketplace; it’s like a great big casino and everyone else is boozing. If you can stick with Pepsi, you should be OK.” First the crowd is boozy on optimism and buying every new issue in sight. The next moment it is boozy on pessimism, buying gold bars and predicting another Great Depression.
and the final word…
Buffett’s final word: “Now is the time to invest and get rich.”
Hat-tip to Newmark’s Door.
The Forbes e-mail today contained a May 3rd article on the Berkshire annual meeting. Highlights as Robert Lezner of Forbes saw it;
1. There were more questions about the dams on Oregon’s Klamath River shutting off the salmon run for Indian tribes than the damming up of the credit markets.
Robert… that’s because special interest groups come specifically to waste time asking these questions. The same things happened last year.
2. No one asked about the $1.6 billion loss Berkshire took on a derivative position in the last quarter. Not a soul inquired about the decline in Berkshire’s earnings.
Perhaps they should have asked, but it seems the derivatives had already been explained. Plus, since Berkshire isn’t in a leveraged position, myself and other shareholders see this for what it is, accounting.
Regarding earnings, this is no surprise to anyone whe’s been paying attention. Guess that doesn’t include you Robert. Doesn’t seem to have hurt the stock price, although it hasn’t helped much either.
3. Nor did anyone raise the provocative theme put forth in Buffett’s letter to shareholders (See “Croesus, Buffett: New Advice From On High”) that investors should not expect to earn on their common stock positions the modest 5.3% rate of return earned during the whole of the 20th century.
Once again, this is typical Buffett. Of course, that’s 5.3% BEFORE dividends.
4. “Anyone who wants us to repeat the past should sell [his or her] stock,” said the Oracle of Omaha, without any follow-up questions from alarmed shareholders. Be fairly warned.
This isn’t the first time we’ve been warned. I guess hearing it from you, Robert, changes everything, eh?
5. Nevertheless, Berkshire was able to accumulate a $4 billion position in auction rate notes when that market froze up some weeks ago. It included the short-term debts of the nonprofit Los Angeles County Museum of Art at interest rates of 8% to 10%–triple the 3% to 4% the same notes sold for in January. Perhaps it was this opportunity that Munger chose to describe in his no-holds-barred style–“some idiot hedge fund bought municipal bonds on incredible margin. These things were disposed on a margin call,” meaning that the fund had to sell because it didn’t have the capital to support its position.
Hey, hey, hey, perhaps this is why we invest in Berkshire. I really like Charlie and recommend reading his biography by Janet Lowe, Damn Right: Behind the Scenes with Berkshire Hathaway Billionaire Charlie Munger .
6. As for the stock market, Buffett, made it crystal clear that “Charlie and I haven’t the faintest idea where [it’s] going.”
Perhaps that’s why they are such great investors.
And before anyone thinks I’m a member of the Berkshire fan club, well I probably am. That said, as a % of my portfolio it’s not a large amount so I maintain the conflict of interest is fairly low. I did attend the 2007 meeting but didn’t make it this year. I purchased my first share of Class B stock the day the market opened after 9/11.
Investors Business Daily takes on Congress for declining oil production.
The unintended consequence of the Congress members’ poor judgment and meddling micromanagement of U.S. energy policy is that they actually hurt most the very people they always profess to be able to help — the average American consumer, lower-income workers and those in the inner city who can’t afford an extra $100 a month to drive to and from their jobs.
and they continue…
Democrats kowtowed to the wishes of their environmental supporters over the basic needs of 300 million American citizens.
It is a national disgrace that all they now know how to do is relentlessly criticize, complain and condemn. They always attempt to blame, investigate and scapegoat someone else, in this case U.S. oil companies, when Congress is the true villain of ineptness for constantly blocking and obstructing every effort for us to become more productive and less dependent on foreign oil
.
and their proposed solution…
Only after we first announce to the world a bold new change in our policy by proclaiming that we intend to begin drilling in ANWR and selected outer sea areas, plus adopt new conservation programs, will the release of oil from our reserves have a major impact on breaking the price of oil.
and this…
If our congressional leadership can’t muster the courage to begin reversing past mistakes now and allow our companies to drill in ANWR and off-limits offshore areas, and build essential refineries and safe nuclear power plants, what will an even-more-discredited Congress do in 2009, 2010 and 2011, when millions of new city dwellers in China and India will be driving the cars their countries are now producing, thereby materially increasing their already huge demand for oil and gas?
Still it’s nice to know global warming is stopped in it’s tracks. Of course, it’s been stopped for a number of years already.
From tomorrows Wall Street Journal, an opinion article that examines energy subsidies as determined by the U.S. Energy Information Agency.
Solar Energy $24.34/megawatt hour
Wind $23.37
Clean coal $29.81
Normal coal $ 0.44
Natural Gas $ 0.25
Hydroelectric $ 0.67
Nuclear Power $ 1.59
I am certainly for sending less money to OPEC, but we also need to make sure our government is spending our tax dollars wisely.
The opinion piece concludes…
All of this shows that there is a reason fossil fuels continue to dominate American energy production: They are extremely cost-effective. That’s a reality to keep in mind the next time you hear a politician talk about creating millions of “green jobs.” Those jobs won’t come cheap, and you’ll be paying for them.