In a recent Daily Camera editorial critizing McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin and the apparent poor job of vetting the Republican’s did, Erika Stutzman states the following…
And given their claims that Palin was properly vetted, why are there so many unanswered questions? About pork-barrel contributions from the same stream linked to a different senator’s indictment? About troopers and librarians, threatened with firings over personal vendettas? A link to a party that wanted Alaska to secede from the union?
A few questions for Erika who is a member of the Daily Camera editorial board:
Erika, why let the facts get in the way of a good editorial?
Why not do some investigation instead of doing the easy job of slamming someone you dislike so much?
Have you thanked the New York Times for leading the way for you?
It also must be frustrating for Erika that her editorials primarily are read by like minded readers so she really isn’t changing many votes.
