MSM/Legacy media, read about your lack of reporting at Fox News. You really should.
But what is the mainstream media’s excuse for cautiously engaging the president on Libya? Aren’t we supposed to be watchdogs? The ongoing story is story focused on whether the Obama administration provided, or refused to provide, adequate protection for the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya when it faced the threat of attack on Sept. 11. The attack left the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans dead. Subsequent conflicting accounts coming from the administration on how the White House responded, or didn’t respond, are tailor-made for a full-blown media feeding frenzy.
Yet, the so-called media watchdogs so far have been mostly toothless.
Indeed they have been and continue to be. Follow the link for example after example. But the conclusion is damning…
So what’s going on here? Are the media just protecting Obama at a critical time in this election campaign, or are they just not following the latest CIA story because they would have to give credit to Fox News?
Whatever the reason, it is not good watchdog journalism.
No wonder Fox News has been and continues to be so successful. This is real story that is being ignored by almost all of the major news outlets. Doesn’t fit the narrative does it? Doesn’t help Obama win re-election does it?
