as reported by the BBC!??
More here, including this nice tidbit…
When the global warming canard migrated from niche research into trillions of dollars of policy changes effecting every human being on the planet, the PhD level of quality control should have been ejected immediately. With the fate of humanity at risk, it is not too much to ask for professional quality code, analysis, and a true peer review process. Not that silly science journal review process by the good ol’ PhDs network, a real review like we do when we launch people into space or build a rail system or a new airplane.
Yet we continuously have been lectured about letting the experts do their work, and your criticism isn’t valid unless you’re a credentialed climatologist. One would hope the global warming religious believers that espoused these points of view would be embarrassed by what has happened. I highly doubt it, although they have certainly toned it down. No doubt, they are still pulling all the political strings they have in the past. That too will change, of course it may take awhile, as the big three networks continue to ignore this scandal. Do you think one day they will figure out why their viewership is declining and why they are referred to as the “legacy media” (do they even realize it’s a derogatory term???). I’ve come to the conclusion they’re too damn stoopid to add 2 + 2 and get 4 much less report the news.
