Contributors to Barack’s election campaign.
Turns out that “Doodad Pro” and “Good Will” are not the only phony contributors to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. The New York Times finally bestirred itself to apply some basic investigative journalism attention to the Democratic presidential nominee’s donor list. The Times found nearly 3,000 other questionable donors like “Jgtj Jfggjjfgj” and “Dirty West” after what the paper admitted was just a cursory look at the Illinois senator’s September financial filings. But then Times reporters Michael Luc and Griff Palmer revealed an incredible level of naivety by stating “it is unclear why someone making a political donation would want to enter a false name.”
One thing I can conclude for sure, New York Times reporters Michael Luc and Griff Palmer are idiotic, naive nimrods.
Another is that Barack’s fundraising activities are full of people who believe that “winning at all costs” justifies whatever laws they need to break to get there. Just like ACORN, this is an organization that is corrupt from the inside out.
Instapundit comments….
The whole deal does seem rather shady. But it’s amazing what you can get away with when the press is totally in the tank.
Hmmm, the Boulder Daily Camera has two article’s on ACORN in two years? Can you spell “in the tank”?
